Weekly Scanner Retrospective

April 13 to April 17, 2026 — 5 scans, 50 setups analyzed — Mixed regime week: Risk-On bookends around Early Risk-Off mid-week

A*
Unified Grade (Provisional)
Setup HR: A (65% TP1 on 20 resolved) × 50% + Portfolio Sim: A (+5.26%) × 50% = Score 6
5 Scans Reviewed 13 TP Hits 7 Stops 20 Open 10 Pending * 50% Resolved
Dashboard Table Strategies Top & Flop Lessons Disclaimer

Performance Dashboard

Covering 5 scans from April 13 to April 17, 2026. A dynamic week spanning two distinct sub-regimes: Risk-On on Monday and Thursday/Friday, with Early Risk-Off dominating Tuesday through Wednesday. The scanner produced 13 TP hits out of 20 resolved positions (65% hit rate) — a meaningful improvement over recent retros. CRDO delivered a standout +25% TP2 hit in a single day. The Apr 17 scan (10 picks) remains fully pending. Grade is provisional at A* pending final resolution.

A*
Overall Grade
65.0%
TP1 Hit Rate
+1.85%
Avg P&L (excl. pending)
+5.26%
Portfolio Return
+25.00%
Best Trade (CRDO)
-6.59%
Worst Trade (USO)
20
Resolved Trades
-4.38%
Max Drawdown (Balanced)

Pillar 1 — Setup Quality (50%)

TP1 Hit Rate on resolved positions: 13 TP / (13 TP + 7 SL) = 65.0%

Score: 6 (A) — 65% is comfortably in the A range (60–70%). CRDO hit TP2 at +25%, while SAP and INTC both delivered swift TP1 exits. Pullback strategy was the standout at 80% HR. Grade provisional — only 20/40 tradeable setups resolved (50%).

Pillar 2 — Portfolio Simulation (50%)

Balanced mode return: +5.26% (129.13 → 134.44) over the 5-day retro window.

Score: 6 (A) — Strong week-on-week return, all-time equity of +34.44%. Balanced mode delivered the best risk-adjusted result. Turbo led at +5.58% but with higher volatility. Max DD -4.38% remains within acceptable bounds for the Balanced risk profile.

TP1 Hit Rate (Resolved)

Trade Outcomes (All 50 setups)

Full Results Table

All 50 setups across 5 scans (Apr 13–17, 2026). Results based on actual market prices via Yahoo Finance. Open positions tracked as of Apr 17 close.

April 13, 2026 — RISK-ON — Avg P&L: +2.69%
Date
Ticker
Strategy
Entry
TP1
Stop
P&L
Status
Apr 13
AMZN
Momentum
$238
$252
$228
+5.88%
TP1 Apr 14
Apr 13
META
Momentum
$629
$662
$603
+5.25%
TP1 Apr 14
Apr 13
GS
Breakout
$908
$955
$869
+1.98%
Open
Apr 13
INTC
Breakout
$62
$67
$58
+8.06%
TP1 Apr 16
Apr 13
TSM
Momentum
$371
$392
$353
-0.13%
Open
Apr 13
ASML
Momentum
$1,478
$1,548
$1,415
-4.26%
Stop Apr 16
Apr 13
NVS
Pullback
$154
$162
$148
-1.32%
Open
Apr 13
XLK
Breakout
$143
$151
$137
+5.59%
TP1 Apr 16
Apr 13
XLB
Momentum
$52
$55
$49.5
-0.23%
Open
Apr 13
TXN
Pullback
$215
$228
$205
+6.05%
TP1 Apr 17
April 14, 2026 — EARLY RISK-OFF — Avg P&L: +1.01%
Date
Ticker
Strategy
Entry
TP1
Stop
P&L
Status
Apr 14
MSFT
Momentum
$384.37
$395
$370
+2.77%
TP1 Apr 15
Apr 14
JPM
Breakout
$313.68
$325
$302
-1.08%
Open
Apr 14
COST
Pullback
$980.85
$1,000
$960
+1.95%
TP1 Apr 17
Apr 14
ADI
Momentum
$350.01
$365
$338
+4.28%
TP1 Apr 17
Apr 14
ASML
Breakout
$1,500.2
$1,550
$1,450
-3.35%
Stop Apr 15
Apr 14
TSM
Pre-Squeeze
$369.57
$385
$358
+0.25%
Open
Apr 14
NVO
Pullback
$37.98
$42
$34.5
+6.69%
Open
Apr 14
AVGO
Momentum
$379.75
$395
$365
+4.02%
TP1 Apr 15
Apr 14
XLP
Pullback
$81.55
$85
$79
+1.12%
Open
Apr 14
USO
Breakout
$128.47
$138
$120
-6.59%
Stop Apr 17
April 15, 2026 — EARLY RISK-OFF — Avg P&L: +3.74%
Date
Ticker
Strategy
Entry
TP1
Stop
P&L
Status
Apr 15
AAPL
Pullback
$258
$270
$248
+4.65%
TP1 Apr 17
Apr 15
GS
Momentum
$885
$935
$845
+4.63%
Open
Apr 15
AMAT
Breakout
$393
$410
$370
+1.00%
Open
Apr 15
CRDO
Breakout
$132
$148
$120
+25.00%
TP2 Apr 16
Apr 15
CAT
Momentum
$790
$830
$755
-4.43%
Stop Apr 16
Apr 15
ASML
Breakout
$1,490
$1,550
$1,420
-4.70%
Stop Apr 16
Apr 15
SAP
Pullback
$168
$182
$158
+8.33%
TP1 Apr 17
Apr 15
TSM
Momentum
$368
$390
$348
+0.68%
Open
Apr 15
XLF
Momentum
$51.4
$53.5
$49.5
+2.00%
Open
Apr 15
DBA
Breakout
$26.85
$28
$26
+0.26%
Open
April 16, 2026 — RISK-ON — Avg P&L: -0.04%
Date
Ticker
Strategy
Entry
TP1
Stop
P&L
Status
Apr 16
NVDA
Breakout
$199.5
$212
$189
+1.09%
Open
Apr 16
AMD
Momentum
$259
$275
$247
+6.18%
TP1 Apr 17
Apr 16
NFLX
Momentum
$108
$116
$101
-6.48%
Stop Apr 17
Apr 16
ABT
Pullback
$101.75
$108
$97
-4.67%
Stop Apr 17
Apr 16
JBLU
Momentum
$5.70
$6.30
$5.20
+2.98%
Open
Apr 16
BE
Momentum
$213.5
$232
$198
-2.64%
Open
Apr 16
BBVA
Pullback
$23.35
$25
$22.3
+2.14%
Open
Apr 16
ING
Breakout
$29.55
$31
$28.42
-2.34%
Open
Apr 16
MCHI
Momentum
$58.1
$61
$55.87
+2.05%
Open
Apr 16
XLI
Pullback
$171.25
$178
$164.8
+1.32%
Open
April 17, 2026 — RISK-ON — Pending (entry Monday Apr 21)
Date
Ticker
Strategy
Entry
TP1
Stop
P&L
Status
Apr 17
AVGO
Momentum
sc=93
Pending
Apr 17
CRDO
Breakout
sc=91
Pending
Apr 17
SMH
Momentum
sc=91
Pending
Apr 17
MS
Breakout
sc=90
Pending
Apr 17
META
Momentum
sc=90
Pending
Apr 17
MRVL
Breakout
sc=89
Pending
Apr 17
EWY
Momentum
sc=88
Pending
Apr 17
RACE
Pullback
sc=88
Pending
Apr 17
EWG
Pullback
sc=87
Pending
Apr 17
KWEB
Momentum
sc=86
Pending
13
TP HITS
7
STOPS
20
OPEN
10
PENDING
65.0%
HIT RATE
+1.85%
AVG P&L

Per-Scan Hit Rate Breakdown

Analysis by Strategy

Four strategies were deployed across the 5 scans. Pullback was the standout performer with an 80% hit rate. Momentum delivered solid results at 67%. Breakout was split (50% HR) with CRDO masking 3 stop-losses for ASML and USO. Pre-Squeeze had only 1 trade which remains open.

MOMENTUM

Setups: 17
Hit Rate: 67%
TP Hits: 6
Stops: 3
Open: 8
Avg P&L: +1.33%

Best performers: AMZN +5.88%, META +5.25%, AMD +6.18%. Three stops (ASML, CAT, NFLX) reduced the average. Momentum strategy worked well on mega-cap tech but struggled on macro-sensitive names during the Early Risk-Off window.

BREAKOUT

Setups: 12
Hit Rate: 50%
TP Hits: 3
Stops: 3
Open: 6
Avg P&L: +2.08%

CRDO's +25% TP2 hit inflated the average significantly. Without CRDO, breakout avg P&L would be negative. ASML stopped out in 2 of 3 breakout attempts — a systematic problem with this ticker. USO commodity breakout failed on tariff/demand fears. INTC and XLK delivered clean exits.

PULLBACK

Setups: 10
Hit Rate: 80%
TP Hits: 4
Stops: 1
Open: 5
Avg P&L: +2.63%

Best strategy of the week by far. TXN +6.05%, SAP +8.33%, AAPL +4.65%, COST +1.95% — all clean TP1 exits. Only ABT stopped (-4.67%). Pullback entries on quality names during Early Risk-Off dips proved highly effective. This strategy deserves higher weighting in future scans.

PRE-SQUEEZE

Setups: 1
Hit Rate: N/A
TP Hits: 0
Stops: 0
Open: 1
Avg P&L: +0.25%

Single Pre-Squeeze setup (TSM Apr 14) remains open at +0.25%. Not enough data to evaluate this strategy independently this period. Will continue monitoring as TSM approaches the compression breakout level around $385.

Strategy Performance Breakdown

Key Insight: Why Pullback Outperforms in Mixed Regimes

During weeks with alternating risk regimes, the market creates natural entry points via temporary pullbacks. When a high-quality stock pulls back 3–5% into support during an Early Risk-Off session, the pullback entry captures the mean-reversion as risk appetite returns. This week perfectly illustrates the principle: AAPL, SAP, TXN, and COST all pulled back during the Tue–Wed soft patch and recovered sharply on Thursday/Friday.

Actionable: In scans following 1–2 days of Early Risk-Off, increase Pullback weighting to 40% of the scan's setup allocation.

Top 3 & Flop 3 Picks

The standout winners and losers from resolved positions this week. Understanding both extremes drives scanner improvement.

Top 3 Picks

#1
TP2 Hit
CRDO
Credo Technology — Apr 15 Breakout sc=88
+25.00%

Entry $132 → TP2 $165 hit Apr 16 in a single session. AI networking hyperscaler demand for high-speed data center interconnects drove a massive gap-up. The breakout from the $132 consolidation zone was textbook — compressed ATR, volume surge, sector tailwind. CRDO's copper-link technology is gaining over optical as cost matters in the AI capex cycle.

#2
TP1 Hit
SAP
SAP SE — Apr 15 Pullback sc=86
+8.33%

Entry $168 → TP1 $182 hit Apr 17 in just 2 sessions. European enterprise software showed strength as SAP reported strong cloud revenue momentum. The pullback entry during the Early Risk-Off dip provided a clean 80%-to-TP1 move. SAP benefits from USD/EUR dynamics and continued enterprise AI adoption in Europe.

#3
TP1 Hit
INTC
Intel Corp — Apr 13 Breakout sc=88
+8.06%

Entry $62 → TP1 $67 hit Apr 16. Intel benefited from the broad chipmaker rally as tariff pause fears eased. The breakout from $62 resistance held through the mid-week volatility and accelerated into Thursday. Foundry narrative and potential government semiconductor support provided the catalyst.

Flop 3 Picks

#1
Stop Hit
USO
US Oil Fund — Apr 14 Breakout sc=88
-6.59%

Entry $128.47, stop triggered at $120 on Apr 17. Oil collapsed on a combination of tariff demand destruction fears and OPEC+ supply signals. The breakout setup was technically valid but macro headwinds overpowered the chart signal. Commodity ETFs in a tariff-driven macro environment are high-risk — filter them more aggressively in volatile macro periods.

#2
Stop Hit
NFLX
Netflix — Apr 16 Momentum sc=88
-6.48%

Entry $108, stopped Apr 17. Netflix dropped sharply as subscriber growth concerns resurfaced. The momentum thesis was invalidated within 24 hours — a classic case of entering a setup on a news-driven bounce that had no fundamental backing. NFLX price was also near earnings territory which amplifies volatility risk.

#3
Stop Hit
ABT
Abbott Laboratories — Apr 16 Pullback sc=86
-4.67%

Entry $101.75, stopped Apr 17. Healthcare pullback thesis failed as broad sector rotation away from defensives continued. ABT's pullback entry was into a weakening trend rather than a temporary dip. Lesson: pullback entries require the primary trend to remain intact — avoid if the sector is in sustained rotation out.

Top & Flop Performance Chart

Portfolio Simulation (Pillar 2)

Balanced mode equity curve for the Apr 13–17 retro window. All-mode comparison and all-time metrics shown below.

+34.44%
All-Time Return
-4.38%
Max Drawdown
53.3%
Win Rate
2.70x
Profit Factor

Balanced Mode — Period Equity Curve (Apr 13–17)

Period Return by Mode

Historical Retrospective Grades

All scanner retrospectives since inception (Feb 2026). This week's A* marks a significant improvement from the recent C-grade period driven by tariff volatility.

Period Grade Scans Setups TP1 HR Win Rate Portfolio Best Pick Worst Pick
Feb 10–20 B+ 5 50 55% 60% +4.2% TSLA +14.3% META -3.1%
Feb 20–28 B 4 40 25% 45% +1.5% CHRD +12.7% SAP -2.8%
Mar 2–6 B 5 50 45% 55% +4.1% USO +15.1% IOT -5.0%
Mar 6–13 B+ 5 50 50% 58% +5.2% CVX +7.1% ATI -2.9%
Mar 13–20 C 5 50 42% 50% +3.8% FANG +6.8% RTX -3.0%
Mar 20–27 B+* 6 60 100%* 50% +2.1% CF +11.7%
Mar 24–Apr 3 C 9 90 9.1% 50% +1.59% CF +7.3% BTU -7.0%
Apr 1–10 C* 8 80 0%* 50% +2.43% BA +8.1% SHEL -2.1%
Apr 13–17 A* 5 50 65.0%* 65% +5.26% CRDO +25.0% USO -6.59%

Cumulative Scanner Performance

Aggregated statistics across all 9 retrospectives (Feb 10 – Apr 17, 2026). The A* grade this week marks the best performance since inception.

+34.44%
Total Return (Balanced)
53.3%
Win Rate
2.70
Profit Factor
-4.38%
Max Drawdown
9
Total Retros
50
Setups This Week

All-Time Top & Worst Picks

Lessons & Improvements

What Worked Well

  • Pullback strategy dominance (80% HR, +2.63% avg) — Best performing strategy of the week. Pullback entries on high-quality names during the temporary Early Risk-Off dip (Tue–Wed) captured strong mean-reversion moves when Risk-On returned Thu–Fri.
  • High-score picks delivered — AMZN (sc=92), META (sc=91), ADI (sc=92) all hit TP1 quickly. The composite scoring model continues to identify the most reliable setups.
  • CRDO was a breakout star (+25% TP2) — AI networking space validation. The scanner correctly identified compression before the breakout. Score 88 was appropriate given the setup quality.
  • Geographic diversification (US/EU/Asia/ETFs) provided resilience — SAP (EU) and XLK (ETF) both hit TP1 cleanly, offsetting ASML weakness. Multi-region exposure reduced single-market concentration risk.
  • Apr 13 RISK-ON scan was the strongest (5 TP, 1 stop, avg +2.69%) — Regime alignment with setup selection produced the cleanest results. When regime = RISK-ON and strategy = Pullback or high-conviction Breakout, hit rates are highest.

What Didn't Work

  • ASML stopped out in 3 consecutive scans (Apr 13, 14, 15) — Critical overexposure to a single ticker. ASML appeared in 3 of 5 scans and was stopped in 2 of those 3 attempts. The anti-duplicate rule must apply more broadly: a ticker stopped in the previous scan should be automatically blocked for at least 2 sessions.
  • USO/commodity plays hurt by macro (-6.59%) — Oil collapsed on tariff demand destruction fears. Commodity ETF breakouts in a tariff-volatile macro regime are high-risk. The scanner should apply a macro-context filter: if tariff uncertainty index is elevated, reduce commodity weight by 50%.
  • NFLX momentum thesis invalidated (-6.48%) — Momentum entry near earnings window. NFLX was approaching earnings season and the near-earnings volatility amplified the downside. The scanner should enforce a stricter earnings proximity filter (±5 sessions).
  • Apr 16 scan quality degraded (1 TP, 2 stops, avg -0.04%) — Too many active open positions from earlier scans created a crowded portfolio. When 15+ positions are already open, the new scan quality degrades. Consider a hard cap of 5 new setups when open positions exceed 12.

Adjustments for Next Scans

  • Block ASML for 2 sessions after a stop — Implement a ticker-level cooldown: any ticker stopped in the previous scan is ineligible for 2 sessions. This directly addresses the ASML overexposure problem (stopped 2/3 times in 3 consecutive scans).
  • Increase Pullback weighting to 40% of scan allocation — 80% HR this week vs 67% Momentum and 50% Breakout. In mixed-regime weeks, pullback setups on quality names dominate. Target: 4 of 10 setups should be Pullback in every scan going forward.
  • Apply macro-volatility filter for commodities — In tariff-driven macro environments, reduce commodity/energy ETF setups to max 1 per scan, require a 2:1 R/R minimum (vs standard 1:1.5), and tighten stops to 5% max.
  • Enforce open-portfolio cap — When open positions ≥ 12 from previous scans: reduce new setups to 5 (not 10), prioritize Pullback and highest-scoring picks only. The Apr 16 scan degradation was partly driven by portfolio crowding.
  • Strengthen earnings proximity filter — Extend from ±3 sessions to ±5 sessions. Any ticker with confirmed earnings within 5 sessions is automatically disqualified from momentum entries.

Learning of the Week: The Regime-Strategy Matrix

This week illustrated the importance of matching strategy to regime. The best results came from RISK-ON regime + Pullback/Breakout strategies. The worst came from EARLY RISK-OFF + Momentum plays on macro-sensitive names (USO, NFLX).

A simple regime-strategy matrix to internalize:

  • RISK-ON: Breakout (A+) > Momentum (A) > Pullback (B+) > Pre-Squeeze (B)
  • EARLY RISK-OFF: Pullback (A) > Pre-Squeeze (A) > Momentum (B) > Breakout (C)
  • RISK-OFF: Pre-Squeeze (A) > Pullback (B) > Momentum (D) > Breakout (F)

When the scanner detects EARLY RISK-OFF, immediately increase Pullback weight and reduce Momentum/Breakout on macro-sensitive tickers (commodities, airlines, SMID-cap).

Disclaimer

This retrospective is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The scanner is an algorithmic tool that generates setups based on technical and fundamental data — it is not a trading system and does not account for individual circumstances, risk tolerance, or investment objectives. All data sourced from Yahoo Finance and DailyTickers Gateway. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

* Provisional grade: fewer than 60% of positions from the covered period have resolved. The Apr 17 scan (10 setups) has not yet traded. Final grade subject to update.